Please Don’t PowerPoint Me to Death

by Dave VanEpps

I have a confession to make. I use PowerPoint. A lot. If PowerPoint had a rewards program, I would probably have lounge access. So when we recently came across client feedback thanking us for not “PowerPointing them to death,” I laughed. And then I thought: Fair.  Because a slide is a tool – it is not a learning strategy. 

Most of us have attended training that goes something like this:

  • The instructor talks.
  • The slides advance.
  • We take notes.
  • Lunch happens.
  • More slides.
  • Eventually, everyone receives a certificate proving they survived.

The problem is not that the content is bad. The problem is that information transfer is not the same thing as transformation. A participant can understand a concept, agree with it, enjoy the class, and still go back to work Monday morning and do exactly what they were doing before.

The Learner Has to Do Some of the Work

When participants tell us what they remember most, it is almost never Slide 47.

  • They remember the case study that made their table argue.
  • The question that did not have one obvious answer.
  • The exercise that exposed a bad assumption.
  • The moment another engineer said something that changed how they saw the problem.
  • The time we refused to just give them the answer.
  • That is intentional.

We design experiences, so participants have to think, discuss, decide, explain, challenge, and apply. Because if the facilitator is doing all the thinking, something has gone wrong. And yes, I say that as someone perfectly capable of adding six more slides “just in case.”

Pinball

Real Work Does Not Come With Speaker Notes

Engineering and leadership are messy. The real problem rarely shows up with four answer choices and a helpful animation.

  • The data is incomplete.
  • The schedule is under pressure.
  • Stakeholders disagree.
  • The technically correct answer may create an organizational problem.
  • The organizationally convenient answer may create a technical one.

That is why judgment matters, and judgment is not built by watching someone else use it. It has to be practiced. That is where experiential learning becomes different from traditional training.

The goal is not simply to teach a framework or knowledge. The goal is to help people recognize when it applies, adapt it to reality, and use it when the stakes are real.

When people know how to apply frameworks and knowledge to solve real-world problems, they have acquired wisdom and become exponentially more valuable to themselves, their organizations, and their customers.

The Slide Is Not the Experience

We are not declaring war on PowerPoint. We still use slides. Quite a few, actually. Slides can create structure, clarify ideas, and give people a common language. But the slide should support the learning. It should not become the learning.

The part we care about most is what happens after the slide:

  • The disagreement.
  • The decision.
  • The better question.
  • The uncomfortable realization.
  • The moment someone says, “We do that.”
  • The idea they are still thinking about on the drive home.

That is when training starts to become transformation.

That is the exceptional difference.

And if nobody had to be PowerPointed to death to get there, even better.

Next Steps

Contact us or visit www.exceptionaldifference.com to learn more about our offerings and how we can help you and your team.  We design our offerings to be experiences – not death by PowerPoint.  Leadership Growth Cycle and the Exceptional Engineering Experience are just a few examples of our offerings that will help you take ownership of your circumstances and identify potential issues early and often.

Follow us on LinkedIn and check out our website to stay connected and learn about our upcoming offerings.